Mayor of Philadelphia v. Mason
This text of 4 U.S. 230 (Mayor of Philadelphia v. Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Some of the objections are insurmountable. In the first place, it is not sufficient to state the evidence ; but the magistrate must go on to declare, that the offence was committed, and the defendant thereof convicted. Here, neither the offence, nor the conviction, are to be found in the proceedings. In the next place, we have no statement where the defendant carried on the business of huckster ; and it might be, where it was no offence to do so ; or where the corporation had no jurisdiction to punish it as an offence.1 The proceedings are, therefore, manifestly erroneous, and must be set aside.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 U.S. 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-of-philadelphia-v-mason-pa-1803.