Mayor of Newark v. Dickerson
This text of 45 N.J.L. 38 (Mayor of Newark v. Dickerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
If any of the pleas demurred to presents a good defence, the defendant is entitled to judgment.
We think the tenth plea is sufficient. It alleges in substance that the obligees in the bond intentionally brought about the breach now complained of. They must therefore be estopped from complaint. The maxims “ volenti non fit injuria,” and “ nullus commodum capere potest de injuria sua propria,” are both in the way of a plaintiff so situated.
It is unnecessary to consider whether mere neglect of legal duty by the city, or active misconduct on the part of other city officers, would impair the obligations of the sureties.
■ Let judgment be entered for the defendants, unless the plaintiffs take leave to withdraw the demurrer and reply, on payment of costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 N.J.L. 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-of-newark-v-dickerson-nj-1883.