Mayor of New York v. Millen
This text of 13 Daly 458 (Mayor of New York v. Millen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Present Larremore, Ch. J., and Vam Hoesem, J.]—Section 1, chapter 758, Laws of 1886, does not require that the authority to serve a summons in an action for a penalty brought in a District Court, in the name of the Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, shall be indorsed upon the summons.
The person whom the Corporation Attorney may designate to serve a summons must be of full age, and the appointment must be in writing. The appointment may be general, for there is no requirement that it shall be specially made in every particular case. All authorizations to act in the name or on behalf of a government, federal, state or municipal, should be in such form that no doubt or question may exist as to their extent or their authenticity."
In the clerk’s office of every district court, it would be well if there were proof that the Corporation Attorney had in writing duly empowered the person who served the summons in an action for a penalty, to make such service. Where such proof is not of record in the clerk’s -office, the district court may require that the authority of the summons-server shall be attached to or else indorsed on the summons. In other words, a general authority to serve a summons may be proved by a writing filed in the office of the clerk of the district court; but a special authority must accompany the summons.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Daly 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-of-new-york-v-millen-nyctcompl-1886.