Mayor of Mobile v. Jones

42 Ala. 630
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1868·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BYRD, J.

1. In the case of Brown v. Mayor, &c., of Mobile, 23 Ala. 722, this court held that the proceedings for the recovery of fines or penalties for the violation of city ordinances, are quasi criminal in their character. And § 2704 of the Code being in derogation of the common law, must be strictly construed, (Sedgw. on St. & Con. Law, 314, and 315 ;) and although the proceeding in this case is quasi criminal, we have come to the conclusion that the appellee was not a competent witness for himself. The court therefore erred in permitting him to testify against the objection of the appellant, and the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mayor of Mobile v. Jones, 42 Ala. 630 (Ala. 1868).

42 Ala. 630 (Mayor of Mobile v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Casteel v. City of Decatur
109 So. 571 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Perry v. State
55 So. 1035 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1911)
Barron v. City of Anniston
48 So. 58 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908)