Mayor of Little Rock v. Bullock
This text of 1 Ark. 282 (Mayor of Little Rock v. Bullock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This case pomes within the rule laid down in Smith vs. Dudley, 2 Ark. Rep. 66, Walker vs. Jefferson, 5 Ark. Rep. 23, and Ashley vs. Hyde & Goodrich, ante 92. After the term at which the judgment by default, and writ of inquiry, and final judgment were rendered thereon, the cause was no longer under the jurisdiction and control of the court, or the parties. The court not having the power to re-open the cause, it could not be done by the consent of the parties, for consent cannot confer jurisdiction. All the proceedings had in this cause subsequent to the final j udgment at the March term, 1840, must be considered as coram nonjudice, and therefore void. The appeal not having been taken at the term at which that judgment was rendered, the same must be- dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Ark. 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-of-little-rock-v-bullock-ark-1845.