Mayor of Jersey City v. Speer
This text of 76 A. 1037 (Mayor of Jersey City v. Speer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We agree with the Supreme Court in its construction of the supplement of 1891 to the so-called Martin act (Pamph. L. 1886, p. 149; Gen. Stat., p. 3370; Pamph. L. 1891, p. 393; Gen. Stat., p. 3384, pl. 451), as expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in that court. We find it unnecessary to pass upon the constitutional question discussed in that opinion.
The judgment under review should be affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chiee Justice; Swayze, Trenchaed, Bergen, Minturn, Bogbrt, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Congdon, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 A. 1037, 79 N.J.L. 598, 50 Vroom 598, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-of-jersey-city-v-speer-nj-1910.