Mayor of Hoboken v. Babbitt
128 A. 266, 101 N.J.L. 403, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 247
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Min-turn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaoh, Lloyd, White, ’Gardner, Yan Buskirk, Clark, MoGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mayor of Hoboken v. Babbitt, 128 A. 266, 101 N.J.L. 403, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 247 (N.J. 1925).
128 A. 266 (Mayor of Hoboken v. Babbitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Breuer v. Montvale
151 A.2d 53 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Whelan v. THE BOROUGH OF CHATHAM
74 A.2d 429 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)