Mayor of Dublin v. Dudley

59 S.E. 84, 2 Ga. App. 762, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 517
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 11, 1907·No. 408·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Russell, J.

One of the grounds of the motion for a new trial is that the court erred in overruling a demurrer. It has been uniformly held, for many years, that this is not a proper ground of a motion for a new trial; and, in the language of Chief Justice Lumpkin, as used in the case of Sutton v. McLeod, 29 Ga. 594, we now say, “This principle is hoary with age. We bow to it reverently.”

Nor is it a good ground for a new trial that the judge failed to charge a proposition of law, ev.en though there was some slight evidence to support a charge thereon, where such charge would have given the defendant the benefit of a theory not hinted at in his answer, and where no written request was presented to the trial judge. There being sufficient evidence to warrant the verdict, which is also approved by the trial judge, it should stand.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mayor of Dublin v. Dudley, 59 S.E. 84, 2 Ga. App. 762, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 517 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

59 S.E. 84 (Mayor of Dublin v. Dudley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guest v. Baldwin
123 S.E.2d 194 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Callaway v. Hopkinsville Milling Co.
157 S.E. 900 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Hall v. Wingate
126 S.E. 796 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Duffey v. State
91 S.E. 908 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Redwine Bros. v. Street
89 S.E. 163 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Equitable Manufacturing Co. v. Hill-Atkinson Co.
87 S.E. 715 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Wills v. Young
83 S.E. 275 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Savannah Chemical Co. v. Beagg & Son
80 S.E. 858 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Duke v. State
79 S.E. 861 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Coulson v. State
78 S.E. 1108 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Fryer v. State
77 S.E. 830 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Hardy v. Boyer
67 S.E. 205 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Sconyers v. State
65 S.E. 814 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)