Mayor of Dawson v. Dawson Waterworks Co.

29 S.E. 755, 102 Ga. 594, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 652
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 10, 1897·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

This being an action against a municipal corporation for a year’s supply of water, in which the plaintiff’s right of recovery depended upon the validity of an alleged contract between it and the defendant, covering a period of years, and the evidence not affirmatively disclosing that when the contract was originally made the municipal corporation had, in the manner prescribed by the constitution of this State, made due and lawful provision for the payment of the yearly sums to become due on such contract, it was error to direct a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring. Complaint. Before Judge Sheffield. Terrell superior court. November term, 1896. J. H. Guerry, M. 0. Edwards, J. A. Laing and J. M. Griggs, for plaintiff in error. Steed & Wimberly and Hoyl & Parks, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mayor of Dawson v. Dawson Waterworks Co., 29 S.E. 755, 102 Ga. 594, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 652 (Ga. 1897).

29 S.E. 755 (Mayor of Dawson v. Dawson Waterworks Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Alma v. Indiana Air-Pump Co.
157 S.E. 376 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)