Mayor of Cordele v. Williams
This text of 67 S.E. 116 (Mayor of Cordele v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A.motion to dismiss a plaintiff’s petition because it “fails to set up a cause of action” is in effect a demurrer; and the refusal to sustain such a motion is not a proper ground for a motion for a new trial, but should be directly excepted to.
2. The refusal of the court to continue a case because of alleged surprise caused by the allowance of an amendment is not cause for reversal, unless the refusal was a clear abuse of discretion. No abuse of discretion [446]*446appears here. Ga., F. & A. Ry. Co. v. Sasser, 4 Ga. App. 276 (61 S. E. 505).
3. The other assignments of error depend upon a consideration of the evidence; and, there being- no proper brief of the evidence, but a copy-of the stenographic report containing much immaterial matter, those assignments will not be considered by this court. Civil Code, § 5488; Albany & Northern Ry. Co. v. Wheeler, 6 Ga, App. 270 (64 S. E. 1114).
Judgment affirmed on main bill of exceptionsj cross-bill of exceptions dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 S.E. 116, 7 Ga. App. 445, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-of-cordele-v-williams-gactapp-1910.