Mayor of Cordele v. Williams

67 S.E. 116, 7 Ga. App. 445, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 340
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 22, 1910
Docket2091, 2092
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 67 S.E. 116 (Mayor of Cordele v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayor of Cordele v. Williams, 67 S.E. 116, 7 Ga. App. 445, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 340 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. A.motion to dismiss a plaintiff’s petition because it “fails to set up a cause of action” is in effect a demurrer; and the refusal to sustain such a motion is not a proper ground for a motion for a new trial, but should be directly excepted to.

2. The refusal of the court to continue a case because of alleged surprise caused by the allowance of an amendment is not cause for reversal, unless the refusal was a clear abuse of discretion. No abuse of discretion [446]*446appears here. Ga., F. & A. Ry. Co. v. Sasser, 4 Ga. App. 276 (61 S. E. 505).

Action for damages; from city court of Cordele — Judge Strozier. July 14, 1910. Submitted December 1, 1909. Decided February 22, 1910. O. T. Gower, Crum cG Jones, for Mayor and Council of Cordele. J. T. Hill, contra.

3. The other assignments of error depend upon a consideration of the evidence; and, there being- no proper brief of the evidence, but a copy-of the stenographic report containing much immaterial matter, those assignments will not be considered by this court. Civil Code, § 5488; Albany & Northern Ry. Co. v. Wheeler, 6 Ga, App. 270 (64 S. E. 1114).

Judgment affirmed on main bill of exceptionsj cross-bill of exceptions dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. Morris
177 S.E. 365 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Lindsey
110 S.E. 636 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Holt
95 S.E. 758 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Mewborn v. Weitzer
84 S.E. 141 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Farmers Oil & Guano Co. v. Southern Refining Co.
73 S.E. 350 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Lanham v. Presley
68 S.E. 448 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 S.E. 116, 7 Ga. App. 445, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-of-cordele-v-williams-gactapp-1910.