Mayor of Columbus v. Arnold
This text of 30 Ga. 517 (Mayor of Columbus v. Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
The defendant in error was summoned to appear before the Mayor and City Council of the city of Columbus, to answer to a charge of the violation of the 44th section of the city ordinances, in refusing to pay the fees and exposing his meat for sale by 6 o’clock, A. m., in said city. On the hearing before the Mayor, the defendant was adjudged guilty, and fined for exposing to sale and selling meats in said city outside of the market. This judgment was carried to the Superior Court by certiorari i-or review, and the judgment of' the Mayor was overruled on the hearing before Judge Worrill, and this latter judgment was brought before us by bill of exceptions. Upon consideration, we affirm his judgment. The ordinance on which the defendant was adjudged to be guilty, was passed long subsequently to the one under which defendant was prosecuted, besides the offense for which he was fined, was a totally different one from the one which he was called upon to answer; and hence, the judgment was necessarily wrong.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 Ga. 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-of-columbus-v-arnold-ga-1860.