Mayor of Brunswick v. Moore

74 Ga. 409, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 324
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 21, 1885·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Complaint was brought on an open account, and the case was submitted to the presiding judge, without a jury, by agreement. The facts were agreed on, except certain provisions of the ordinances of the city of Brunswick, which were introduced in evidence. The judge rendered judgment for the plaintiff for a specified amount. Defendant excepted, and assigned error in the following words: “ Defendant in said case excepted, and now excepts, to said judgment, and assigns the same as error:”

Held, that this was too general an assignment. It should have stated wherein the error cf such judgment consisted, and shown whether it attacked the amount of the finding, or the judgment as finding on facts or on law. Hall et al. vs. Huff et al., infra.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mayor of Brunswick v. Moore, 74 Ga. 409, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 324 (Ga. 1885).

74 Ga. 409 (Mayor of Brunswick v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sherrill v. Sherrill
42 S.E.2d 921 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Federal Land Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
2 S.E.2d 916 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Patterson v. Beck
66 S.E. 911 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Wade v. Watson
66 S.E. 922 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Eastmore v. Bunkley
39 S.E. 105 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Peavy v. Atkinson Bros.
33 S.E. 956 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Holst v. Burrus
79 Ga. 111 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1887)