Mayor of Birmingham v. Durham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Mayor of Birmingham v. Durham

139 Ala. 662

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1903·Published

Opinion

This action was brought by the appellee against the appellant, to recover damages resulting from the pollution of a stream, by the emptying .therein of the seiver-age of the city of Birmingham, which stream ran through plaintiff’s land.

There was judgment in favor of the plaintiff, assessing has damages at $168. The defendant appeals.

Judgment is affirmed on the authority of Mayor and Aldermen of Birmingham v. Land, 137 Ala. 538.

Opinion by Dowdell, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This action was brought by the appellee against the appellant, to recover damages resulting from the pollution of a stream, by the emptying .therein of the seiver-age of the city of Birmingham, which stream ran through plaintiff’s land.

There was judgment in favor of the plaintiff, assessing has damages at $168. The defendant appeals.

Judgment is affirmed on the authority of Mayor and Aldermen of Birmingham v. Land, 137 Ala. 538.

Opinion by Dowdell, J.

Mayor of Birmingham v. Durham, 139 Ala. 662 (Ala. 1903).

Pincite

139 Ala. 662 (Mayor of Birmingham v. Durham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related