Mayor of Baltimore v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
This text of 324 F. App'x 251 (Mayor of Baltimore v. Wells Fargo Bank NA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
David M. Kissi seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying various motions he filed in the underlying proceeding which is ongoing in the district court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Kissi seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor ap-pealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny Kissi’s motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 F. App'x 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-of-baltimore-v-wells-fargo-bank-na-ca4-2009.