Mayor of Americus v. Eldridge

33 S.E. 654, 108 Ga. 778, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 397
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 31, 1899·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Little, J.

1. The charge complained of in the present case was substantially in accord with section 3586 of the Civil Code, and therefore correct as an abstract proposition of law. This being so, and the motion for a new trial alleging no reason why the charge in question was inappropriate in the present case, the giving of it can not be treated as affording cause for a new trial.

2. There was sufficient evidence to warrant the verdict, and the same having been approved by the trial judge, this court will not control his discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mayor of Americus v. Eldridge, 33 S.E. 654, 108 Ga. 778, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 397 (Ga. 1899).

33 S.E. 654 (Mayor of Americus v. Eldridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Bond
36 S.E. 299 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)