Mayor Mark A. Bricker, Julie Estlinbaum, Councilwoman, Position 1, Bill Cornman, Councilman, Position 2, and the City of Bay City, Texas v. Robert Neal Head
This text of Mayor Mark A. Bricker, Julie Estlinbaum, Councilwoman, Position 1, Bill Cornman, Councilman, Position 2, and the City of Bay City, Texas v. Robert Neal Head (Mayor Mark A. Bricker, Julie Estlinbaum, Councilwoman, Position 1, Bill Cornman, Councilman, Position 2, and the City of Bay City, Texas v. Robert Neal Head) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-18-00484-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
MARK A. BRICKER, MAYOR; JULIE ESTLINBAUM, COUNCILWOMAN, POSITION 1; BILL CORNMAN, COUNCILMAN, POSITION 2; AND CITY OF BAY CITY, TEXAS Appellants,
v.
ROBERT NEAL HEAD, Appellee.
On appeal from the 23rd District Court of Matagorda County, Texas.
ORDER Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Perkes Order Per Curiam Appellee filed suit challenging the validity of section 4.01 of the Bay City Charter
and alleging ultra vires conduct by city officials. The city and its officials seek interlocutory review of an order denying their plea to the jurisdiction. Since briefing was completed in
this case, the city passed Ordinance No. 1628, which amended section 4.01 by striking
the very language appellee complained was invalid. See TEX. R. EVID. 204(a), (b)(1) (a
court make take judicial notice of municipal ordinances on its own); Amarillo v. R.R.
Comm’n of Tex., 511 S.W.3d 787, 794 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2016, no pet.) (taking notice
of city ordinances).
The Court hereby abates this appeal and requests supplemental briefing from the
parties on whether any of appellee’s claims have become moot during the pendency of
this appeal. See Tex. Ass’n of Bus. v. Tex. Air. Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 445–46
(Tex. 1993) (an appellate court may consider its subject matter jurisdiction sua sponte);
TEX. R. APP. P. 38.7 (“A brief may be amended or supplemented whenever justice
requires, on whatever terms the court may prescribe.”). Appellants’ supplemental brief
shall be filed within twenty days from the date of this order. Appellee’s supplemental
brief shall be filed fourteen days thereafter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 17th day of June, 2019.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mayor Mark A. Bricker, Julie Estlinbaum, Councilwoman, Position 1, Bill Cornman, Councilman, Position 2, and the City of Bay City, Texas v. Robert Neal Head, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-mark-a-bricker-julie-estlinbaum-councilwoman-position-1-bill-texapp-2019.