Mayor &C. of Savannah v. Palefsky

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mayor &C. of Savannah v. Palefsky

85 S.E.2d 817, 91 Ga. App. 392, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 757

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 25, 1955

Docket35417

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 85 S.E.2d 817 (Mayor &C. of Savannah v. Palefsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mayor &C. of Savannah v. Palefsky, 85 S.E.2d 817, 91 Ga. App. 392, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 757 (Ga. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Nichols, J.

The defendant in the court below contends that no cause of action is stated against it because, by an act of 1895, the General Assembly vested exclusive jurisdiction over trees, parks, grass plats, etc., within the City of Savannah in the Park and Tree Commission, an independent agency. This act does not relieve the city of the duty to keep its sidewalks in a reasonably safe condition. Mayor &c. of Savannah v. Harvey, 87 Ga. App. 122 (73 S. E. 2d 260). In that case it was alleged that the city was negligent in not removing rotten limbs from a tree which was growing in the unpaved area between the sidewalk and the street. In the present case it is alleged that the city was negligent in allowing a water-meter box to be located lower than *395 the surrounding ground in that unpaved area between the sidewalk and the street, that this area was used and had been used for at least ten years by the public, and that the water-meter box had been lower than the surrounding land for a period of at least two years prior to the injury of the plaintiff. The record does not disclose whether the unpaved area between the sidewalk and the street in the present case is part of a park. Mayor &c. of Savannah v. Harvey, supra. In the present case it is alleged that the water-meter box was under the exclusive control of the city, and was used as a part of the installation furnishing water to the residence located at 1316 East Fifty-first Street. A city, in maintaining a waterworks system and furnishing its residents with water for domestic and commercial purposes, and charging therefor, is engaged in a private, nongovernmental business, and is liable to one injured because of its negligence. City of Tallapoosa v. Goebel, 63 Ga. App. 1 (10 S. E. 2d 201); Atlanta v. Blackmon, 51 Ga. App. 165 (179 S. E. 842). As against a general demurrer the petition set forth a cause of action.

The exceptions to the overruling of special demurrers, not being argued or expressly insisted upon, will be treated as being abandoned. Mayor &c. of Savannah v. Harvey, supra.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols, J.

The defendant in the court below contends that no cause of action is stated against it because, by an act of 1895, the General Assembly vested exclusive jurisdiction over trees, parks, grass plats, etc., within the City of Savannah in the Park and Tree Commission, an independent agency. This act does not relieve the city of the duty to keep its sidewalks in a reasonably safe condition. Mayor &c. of Savannah v. Harvey, 87 Ga. App. 122 (73 S. E. 2d 260). In that case it was alleged that the city was negligent in not removing rotten limbs from a tree which was growing in the unpaved area between the sidewalk and the street. In the present case it is alleged that the city was negligent in allowing a water-meter box to be located lower than *395 the surrounding ground in that unpaved area between the sidewalk and the street, that this area was used and had been used for at least ten years by the public, and that the water-meter box had been lower than the surrounding land for a period of at least two years prior to the injury of the plaintiff. The record does not disclose whether the unpaved area between the sidewalk and the street in the present case is part of a park. Mayor &c. of Savannah v. Harvey, supra. In the present case it is alleged that the water-meter box was under the exclusive control of the city, and was used as a part of the installation furnishing water to the residence located at 1316 East Fifty-first Street. A city, in maintaining a waterworks system and furnishing its residents with water for domestic and commercial purposes, and charging therefor, is engaged in a private, nongovernmental business, and is liable to one injured because of its negligence. City of Tallapoosa v. Goebel, 63 Ga. App. 1 (10 S. E. 2d 201); Atlanta v. Blackmon, 51 Ga. App. 165 (179 S. E. 842). As against a general demurrer the petition set forth a cause of action.

The exceptions to the overruling of special demurrers, not being argued or expressly insisted upon, will be treated as being abandoned. Mayor &c. of Savannah v. Harvey, supra.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 S.E.2d 817, 91 Ga. App. 392, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-c-of-savannah-v-palefsky-gactapp-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack