MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND HILL Et Al. v. MAIA

805 S.E.2d 635, 342 Ga. App. 887, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 431
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND HILL Et Al. v. MAIA. Read the opinion of the Court — 336 Ga. App. 555
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 27, 2017·No. A15A2334·Published

Opinion

Ellington, Presiding Judge.

In City of Richmond Hill v. Maia, 301 Ga. 257 (800 SE2d 573) (2017), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed Division 2 of our opinion in Mayor and City Council of Richmond Hill v. Maia, 336 Ga. App. 555 (784 SE2d 894) (2016), holding that Appellee cannot demonstrate proximate cause and that “Appellants were entitled to summary judgment in their favor.” City of Richmond Hill v. Maia, 301 Ga. at 262 (2). Accordingly, we vacate Division 2 of our opinion and adopt the opinion of our Supreme Court as our own in place of that division.

Judgment reversed.

Dillard, C. J., Barnes, P. J., Ray, P. J., McMillian, Reese, and Bethel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND HILL Et Al. v. MAIA, 805 S.E.2d 635, 342 Ga. App. 887, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 431 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

805 S.E.2d 635 (MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND HILL Et Al. v. MAIA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND HILL Et Al. v. MAIA
784 S.E.2d 894 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2016)
City of Richmond Hill v. Maia
800 S.E.2d 573 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2017)