Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND HILL Et Al. v. MAIA

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND HILL Et Al. v. MAIA

805 S.E.2d 635, 342 Ga. App. 887, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 431
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 27, 2017
DocketA15A2334
StatusPublished

This text of 805 S.E.2d 635 (MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND HILL Et Al. v. MAIA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND HILL Et Al. v. MAIA, 805 S.E.2d 635, 342 Ga. App. 887, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 431 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Ellington, Presiding Judge.

In City of Richmond Hill v. Maia, 301 Ga. 257 (800 SE2d 573) (2017), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed Division 2 of our opinion in Mayor and City Council of Richmond Hill v. Maia, 336 Ga. App. 555 (784 SE2d 894) (2016), holding that Appellee cannot demonstrate proximate cause and that “Appellants were entitled to summary judgment in their favor.” City of Richmond Hill v. Maia, 301 Ga. at 262 (2). Accordingly, we vacate Division 2 of our opinion and adopt the opinion of our Supreme Court as our own in place of that division.

Judgment reversed.

Dillard, C. J., Barnes, P. J., Ray, P. J., McMillian, Reese, and Bethel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND HILL Et Al. v. MAIA
784 S.E.2d 894 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2016)
City of Richmond Hill v. Maia
800 S.E.2d 573 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
805 S.E.2d 635, 342 Ga. App. 887, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-and-city-council-of-the-city-of-richmond-hill-et-al-v-maia-gactapp-2017.