Mayo v. United States

49 Ct. Cl. 144, 1913 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 14, 1913 WL 1295
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedDecember 1, 1913
DocketNo. 31893
StatusPublished

This text of 49 Ct. Cl. 144 (Mayo v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayo v. United States, 49 Ct. Cl. 144, 1913 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 14, 1913 WL 1295 (cc 1913).

Opinion

Per Cubiam:

We can not distinguish this case under the findings of fact in any substantial feature from that of United States v. Finnell (185 U. S., 236), which is controlling upon this court.

It is true that the judge did not indorse on the decrees sent by him to the clerk in this case "enter this order,” but they were sent as orders or decrees in equity proceedings pending in the court, and it was the clerk’s duty to enter them upon the record and file them. R. S., 794.

Under the influence of the Fennell case we think the claimant should recover, and judgment will he rendered in his favor for said sum of $31.80.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Finnell
185 U.S. 236 (Supreme Court, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 Ct. Cl. 144, 1913 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 14, 1913 WL 1295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayo-v-united-states-cc-1913.