Mayo v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Mayo v. State

277 S.W. 639, 102 Tex. Crim. 268, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1088

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedNovember 18, 1925

DocketNo. 9836.

StatusPublished

This text of 277 S.W. 639 (Mayo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mayo v. State, 277 S.W. 639, 102 Tex. Crim. 268, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1088 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for manslaughter. Punishment is five years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts. The only exceptions relate to the refusal of two special charges requested by appellant. Without knowledge of the facts we can not know the relevancy of the requested charges, but must presume the court’s action in refusing them was correct.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for manslaughter. Punishment is five years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts. The only exceptions relate to the refusal of two special charges requested by appellant. Without knowledge of the facts we can not know the relevancy of the requested charges, but must presume the court’s action in refusing them was correct.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 S.W. 639, 102 Tex. Crim. 268, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayo-v-state-texcrimapp-1925.