Mayo v. State

1952 OK CR 147, 250 P.2d 228, 96 Okla. Crim. 143, 1952 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 234
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 12, 1952
DocketA-11713
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 1952 OK CR 147 (Mayo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayo v. State, 1952 OK CR 147, 250 P.2d 228, 96 Okla. Crim. 143, 1952 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 234 (Okla. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

JONES, J.

This is an attempted appeal from a conviction sustained in the county court of Beaver county for the misdemeanor of driving an automobile on the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.

■ Judgment and sentence was pronounced against the accused on August 20, 1951. The appeal was not lodged in this court until February 8, 1952, more than five months after the defendant was sentenced.

Title 22 O.S. 1951 § 1054, provides:

“In misdemeanor eases the appeal must be taken within sixty days after the judgment is rendered: Provided, However, that the trial court or judge may, for good cause shown, extend the time in which such appeal may be taken not exceeding sixty days.”

In Cruse v. State, 86 Okla. Cr. 83, 187 P. 2d 235, it is held:

“While the appeal may be taken by defendant as a matter of right from judgment of conviction, the manner of taking and perfecting such appeal is a proper matter of legislative control, and the statute prescribing the manner in which an appeal can be taken is mandatory.
“A failure to file the appeal in the appellate court within the time allowed by law is fatal to the appeal, and the appellate court has no discretion to hear and determine appeals on the merits when they are not taken within the time prescribed by statute.”

This appeal, not having been filed within 120 days after the rendition of the judgment, the motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal must be sustained.

The attempted appeal herein is therefore dismissed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court, with directions to enforce its judgment and sentence.

BRETT, P. J., and POWELL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Canady v. Reynolds
1994 OK CR 54 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1994)
Rodrick v. State
1966 OK CR 40 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1966)
Nard v. State
1965 OK CR 158 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1965)
Thomas v. Johnson
1965 OK CR 22 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1965)
Scobie v. Page
1964 OK CR 113 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1964)
O'Donnell v. State
1964 OK CR 95 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1964)
Jones v. Graham
395 P.2d 586 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1964)
Chase v. State
1963 OK CR 12 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1963)
Neal v. State
1960 OK CR 78 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1960)
Alexander v. State
1956 OK CR 27 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1956)
Ex Parte Beard
1953 OK CR 173 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1952 OK CR 147, 250 P.2d 228, 96 Okla. Crim. 143, 1952 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayo-v-state-oklacrimapp-1952.