Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Mayo v. State

Mayo v. State

908 S.W.2d 715, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1428, 1995 WL 464866
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 8, 1995
DocketNo. 67302
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 908 S.W.2d 715 (Mayo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayo v. State, 908 S.W.2d 715, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1428, 1995 WL 464866 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gonzalez v. State
155 S.W.3d 603 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Espinoza v. State
955 S.W.2d 108 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Caballero v. State
919 S.W.2d 919 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
908 S.W.2d 715, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1428, 1995 WL 464866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayo-v-state-moctapp-1995.