Mayo v. State

820 So. 2d 331, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 721, 2002 WL 115531
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 30, 2002
DocketNo. 4D01-5054
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 820 So. 2d 331 (Mayo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayo v. State, 820 So. 2d 331, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 721, 2002 WL 115531 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing a motion that satisfies the. requirements of Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

FARMER, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Geffkin v. State
820 So. 2d 331 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
820 So. 2d 331, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 721, 2002 WL 115531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayo-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.