Mayo v. State

106 So. 921, 21 Ala. App. 685
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 12, 1926·No. 6 Div. 777.·Published

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

The evidence was in conflict. The general charge was properly refused. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mayo v. State, 106 So. 921, 21 Ala. App. 685 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

106 So. 921 (Mayo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.