Mayo v. State

106 So. 921, 21 Ala. App. 685
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 12, 1926
Docket6 Div. 777.
StatusPublished

This text of 106 So. 921 (Mayo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayo v. State, 106 So. 921, 21 Ala. App. 685 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

The evidence was in conflict. The general charge was properly refused. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 So. 921, 21 Ala. App. 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayo-v-state-alactapp-1926.