Mayo v. Schenck
237 A.D. 911
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1933
StatusPublished
This text of 237 A.D. 911 (Mayo v. Schenck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mayo v. Schenck, 237 A.D. 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
Opinion
Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss amended complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The defendants’ time to answer is extended ten days from the date of the entry of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
237 A.D. 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayo-v-schenck-nyappdiv-1933.