Mayo v. Owens

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mayo v. Owens

385 So. 2d 143, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17021

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 23, 1980

DocketNo. MM-384

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 385 So. 2d 143 (Mayo v. Owens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mayo v. Owens, 385 So. 2d 143, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17021 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a second appeal from the same case below, the first having been determined by our opinion in Mayo v. Owens, 367 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). The previous appeal was from a summary final judgment for plaintiffs/appellees as to Counts I and X of the complaint. Before our aforesaid opinion which reversed the final summary judgment was filed on February 1, 1979, the learned trial judge entered a summary final judgment as to Counts II through IX and Count XI of the complaint, making the same ruling as to Counts II through IX and XI that he had previously made as to Counts I and X. This appeal has been taken from the second summary final judgment in the case and it involves the same questions which this Court ruled upon in its opinion in the prior appeal. Appellees, simply contend here that we should recede from our previous opinion which we decline to do.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with Mayo v. Owens, supra.

McCORD, LARRY G. SMITH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a second appeal from the same case below, the first having been determined by our opinion in Mayo v. Owens, 367 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). The previous appeal was from a summary final judgment for plaintiffs/appellees as to Counts I and X of the complaint. Before our aforesaid opinion which reversed the final summary judgment was filed on February 1, 1979, the learned trial judge entered a summary final judgment as to Counts II through IX and Count XI of the complaint, making the same ruling as to Counts II through IX and XI that he had previously made as to Counts I and X. This appeal has been taken from the second summary final judgment in the case and it involves the same questions which this Court ruled upon in its opinion in the prior appeal. Appellees, simply contend here that we should recede from our previous opinion which we decline to do.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with Mayo v. Owens, supra.

McCORD, LARRY G. SMITH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

385 So. 2d 143, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayo-v-owens-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack