Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Mayo v. Olmstead, No. 055526 (Aug. 26, 1991)

Mayo v. Olmstead, No. 055526 (Aug. 26, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 7144
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedAugust 26, 1991
DocketNo. 055526
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 7144 (Mayo v. Olmstead, No. 055526 (Aug. 26, 1991)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayo v. Olmstead, No. 055526 (Aug. 26, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 7144 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM RE: MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL FROM PROBATE (#106) The defendants/appellees move to dismiss the plaintiff/appellants appeal from probate on the grounds that the reasons of appeal have not been filed.

Failure to file the reasons of appeal within ten days after the return date, does not deprive the court of jurisdiction. Barlow v. Pocsay, 21 Conn. Sup. 352, 35.3 (Super.Ct. 1959). Accordingly, the motion to dismiss appeal from probate is denied.

PICKETT, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barlow v. Pocsay
154 A.2d 753 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 7144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayo-v-olmstead-no-055526-aug-26-1991-connsuperct-1991.