Mayo v. Nissan Motors Corp.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Mayo v. Nissan Motors Corp.

644 So. 2d 661, 1994 La. LEXIS 2702, 1994 WL 634366

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 11, 1994

DocketNo. 94-C-1978

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 644 So. 2d 661 (Mayo v. Nissan Motors Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mayo v. Nissan Motors Corp., 644 So. 2d 661, 1994 La. LEXIS 2702, 1994 WL 634366 (La. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Nissan Industrial Equipment; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Catahoula, 7th Judicial District Court,. Div. “A”, No. 17,007; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA93-0852.

Granted and remanded to the court of appeal to consider Nissan Industrial Equipment Company’s and Red River Marine’s third party demands against Everette Mayo for reasons assigned by Judge Culpepper in his dissenting in part opinion.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Nissan Industrial Equipment; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Catahoula, 7th Judicial District Court,. Div. “A”, No. 17,007; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA93-0852.

Granted and remanded to the court of appeal to consider Nissan Industrial Equipment Company’s and Red River Marine’s third party demands against Everette Mayo for reasons assigned by Judge Culpepper in his dissenting in part opinion.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

644 So. 2d 661, 1994 La. LEXIS 2702, 1994 WL 634366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayo-v-nissan-motors-corp-la-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack