Mayo v. Nissan Motors Corp.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Mayo v. Nissan Motors Corp.

644 So. 2d 661, 1994 La. LEXIS 2702, 1994 WL 634366

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 11, 1994·No. No. 94-C-1978·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re Nissan Industrial Equipment; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Catahoula, 7th Judicial District Court,. Div. “A”, No. 17,007; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA93-0852.

Granted and remanded to the court of appeal to consider Nissan Industrial Equipment Company’s and Red River Marine’s third party demands against Everette Mayo for reasons assigned by Judge Culpepper in his dissenting in part opinion.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Nissan Industrial Equipment; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Catahoula, 7th Judicial District Court,. Div. “A”, No. 17,007; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA93-0852.

Granted and remanded to the court of appeal to consider Nissan Industrial Equipment Company’s and Red River Marine’s third party demands against Everette Mayo for reasons assigned by Judge Culpepper in his dissenting in part opinion.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Mayo v. Nissan Motors Corp., 644 So. 2d 661, 1994 La. LEXIS 2702, 1994 WL 634366 (La. 1994).

Pincite

644 So. 2d 661 (Mayo v. Nissan Motors Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related