Mayo v. Nissan Motor Corp.
644 So. 2d 661, 1994 La. LEXIS 2701
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mayo v. Nissan Motor Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 644 So. 2d 661 →
Opinion
In re Red River Marine, Inc.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Catahoula, 7th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 17,007; to the [662]*662Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA93-0852.
Granted and remanded to the court of appeal to consider Nissan Industrial Equipment Company’s and Red River Marine’s third party demands against Everette Mayo for reasons assigned by Judge Culpepper in his dissenting in part opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mayo v. Nissan Motor Corp., 644 So. 2d 661, 1994 La. LEXIS 2701 (La. 1994).
644 So. 2d 661 (Mayo v. Nissan Motor Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.