Mayo v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Georgia

Mayo v. Mayo

172 S.E. 628, 178 Ga. 221, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 17

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 16, 1934

DocketNo. 9734

StatusPublished

This text of 172 S.E. 628 (Mayo v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mayo v. Mayo, 172 S.E. 628, 178 Ga. 221, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 17 (Ga. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

A wife instituted suit for divorce on the ground of cruel treatment, praying for custody of two minor children, and for alimony. The judge, under the pleadings and evidence, did not err at an interlocutory hearing in awarding the custody of the children to the wife, and in granting temporary alimony including attorney’s fees. Nor was the amount which the judge allowed excessive.

Judgment affirmed.

Russell, G. J., Beak, P. J., and Gilbert and Bell, JJ., concur. M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff in error. Porier & Mebane, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

A wife instituted suit for divorce on the ground of cruel treatment, praying for custody of two minor children, and for alimony. The judge, under the pleadings and evidence, did not err at an interlocutory hearing in awarding the custody of the children to the wife, and in granting temporary alimony including attorney’s fees. Nor was the amount which the judge allowed excessive.

Judgment affirmed.

Russell, G. J., Beak, P. J., and Gilbert and Bell, JJ., concur. M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff in error. Porier & Mebane, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 S.E. 628, 178 Ga. 221, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayo-v-mayo-ga-1934.