Mayo v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Georgia

Mayo v. Mayo

172 S.E. 628, 178 Ga. 221, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 17

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 16, 1934·No. No. 9734·Published

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

A wife instituted suit for divorce on the ground of cruel treatment, praying for custody of two minor children, and for alimony. The judge, under the pleadings and evidence, did not err at an interlocutory hearing in awarding the custody of the children to the wife, and in granting temporary alimony including attorney’s fees. Nor was the amount which the judge allowed excessive.

Judgment affirmed.

Russell, G. J., Beak, P. J., and Gilbert and Bell, JJ., concur. M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff in error. Porier & Mebane, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

A wife instituted suit for divorce on the ground of cruel treatment, praying for custody of two minor children, and for alimony. The judge, under the pleadings and evidence, did not err at an interlocutory hearing in awarding the custody of the children to the wife, and in granting temporary alimony including attorney’s fees. Nor was the amount which the judge allowed excessive.

Judgment affirmed.

Russell, G. J., Beak, P. J., and Gilbert and Bell, JJ., concur. M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff in error. Porier & Mebane, contra.

Mayo v. Mayo, 172 S.E. 628, 178 Ga. 221, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 17 (Ga. 1934).

Pincite

172 S.E. 628 (Mayo v. Mayo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.