Mayo v. Commissioners of Beaufort County

144 S.E. 925, 196 N.C. 15, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 260
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 12, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 144 S.E. 925 (Mayo v. Commissioners of Beaufort County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayo v. Commissioners of Beaufort County, 144 S.E. 925, 196 N.C. 15, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 260 (N.C. 1928).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

As the bonds in question are to be issued in accordance with the provisions of the County Finance Act, chapter 81, Public Laws 1927, for the purpose of funding valid and binding obligations of Beaufort County, incurred prior to 1 July, 1927, for the necessary expenses of the county, the special county purposes appearing from resolutions duly adopted, it is difficult to perceive upon what ground the bonds may be successfully assailed in view of our holdings in Commissioners of McDowell v. Assell, 194 N. C., 412, 140 S. E., 34, affirmed on rehearing, 195 N. C., 719, 143 S. E., 474, and R. R. v. Cherolcee County, 195 N. C., 756, 143 S. E., 467. On authority of the holdings in these cases, the judgment in the instant case must be upheld.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. . McAlhaney
6 S.E.2d 517 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Glenn v. . Commissioners of Durham
159 S.E. 430 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Glenn v. Board of County Commissioners
201 N.C. 233 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Barbour v. County of Wake
148 S.E. 470 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 S.E. 925, 196 N.C. 15, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayo-v-commissioners-of-beaufort-county-nc-1928.