Home/Court of Appeals of Virginia/Mayo v. Clark

Mayo v. Clark

6 Va. 234
Court of Appeals of Virginia·Decided April 18, 1800·Published

Opinion

LYONS, Judge,

informed him, that the Court were of opinion that a mandamus was not a proper remedy: That they did not pretend to prescribe what mode he should pursue; because, it was sufficient for them to say that his present application was improper.

Whereupon, Randolph moved for, and obtained a writ of supersedeas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mayo v. Clark, 6 Va. 234 (Va. Ct. App. 1800).

6 Va. 234 (Mayo v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.