Maynoldi v. State

456 So. 2d 587, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2109, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15320
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 2, 1984·No. No. 84-50·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reject Maynoldi’s claim that" the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions for the crimes of second-degree murder and attempted second-degree murder. We also conclude that the trial court properly imposed a thirty-year sentence on the second-degree murder conviction because (1) by virtue of the defendant’s use of a firearm in the killing, the offense was reclassified to a life felony, see § 775.-087(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1981), punishable by imprisonment for life or for a term of years not less than thirty, see § 775.082(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1981); and (2) as the Rules of Criminal Procedure expressly provide, this mandatory sentence, being greater than the sentence calculated under the sentencing guidelines, takes precedence over any suggested guideline sentence, see Fla.R.Cr.P. 3.701(d)(9).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maynoldi v. State, 456 So. 2d 587, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2109, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15320 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

456 So. 2d 587 (Maynoldi v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. State
898 So. 2d 191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Mischler v. State
458 So. 2d 37 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)