Maynard W. Scott v. United States of America, Walter B. Fagan v. United States
This text of 248 F.2d 754 (Maynard W. Scott v. United States of America, Walter B. Fagan v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
248 F.2d 754
101 U.S.App.D.C. 341
Maynard W. SCOTT, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Walter B. FAGAN, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Nos. 13961, 13962.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Sept. 24, 1957.
Decided Oct. 3, 1957.
Mr. John J. Beatty, III, Washington, D.C., appointed by the District Court, for appellant in No. 13,961.
Mr. Martin J. McNamara, Jr., Washington, D.C., for appellant in No. 13,962.
Mr. Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Lewis Carroll, Arthur J. McLaughlin and Nathan J. Paulson, Asst. U.S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.
Before WILBUR K. MILLER, DANAHER and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Jointly indicted for robbery and found guilty by a jury, Maynard W. Scott and Walter B. Fagan appeal. Their principal ground is that the District Court erred in refusing to suppress for use as evidence substantial sums of money found on their persons when they were arrested two or three hours after the robbery. We think the search and seizure were incidents of a lawful arrest.
We have examined all other reasons for reversal advanced by appellants but regard them as insubstantial.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 F.2d 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maynard-w-scott-v-united-states-of-america-walter-b-fagan-v-united-cadc-1957.