Maynard v. Wight

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Maynard v. Wight

102 S.E. 375, 24 Ga. App. 815, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 540

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 2, 1920

Docket11119

StatusPublished

This text of 102 S.E. 375 (Maynard v. Wight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maynard v. Wight, 102 S.E. 375, 24 Ga. App. 815, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 540 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Ltjke, J.

A motion is made to dismiss the bill of exceptions in this ease, upon the ground that it was not served within the time required by the Civil Code (1910), § 6160. Inasmuch as the defendant in error, in his acknowledgement of service, preserved his right to dismiss upon the ground now urged, and the record showing (and by the record [816]*816this court is bound) that service of the bill of exceptions was not had in the time required by law, the writ of error must be

Decided March 2, 1920.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Pendleton. September 22, 1919.

Albert Kemper, Thomas E. Scolb, for plaintiff in error. E. M. Habersham, W. I. Heyward, contra.

Dismissed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworlh, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI