Maynard v. Penniman
7 Mich. 333, 1859 Mich. LEXIS 65
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Maynard v. Penniman. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Mich. 153 →
Opinion
We can recognize no agent for the purpose of the service of papers, unless residing at Detroit or Lansing.
Besides, the time for which notice was given in this case was insufficient. It is the residence of the attorney, [334]*334and not that of the agent, which determines the time for which notice must be given. Rule twenty - six requires a ten days notice where the attorney resides over a hundred miles from the place of hearing, and that should have been given in this case, whether served on an agent or personally.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maynard v. Penniman, 7 Mich. 333, 1859 Mich. LEXIS 65 (Mich. 1859).
7 Mich. 333 (Maynard v. Penniman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.