Maynard v. Morton

82 N.E.2d 798, 323 Mass. 752, 1948 Mass. LEXIS 630
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 27, 1948·Published

Opinion

Orders denying jury issues affirmed. These are appeals from orders of the Probate Court denying motions for jury issues in the matter of the alleged will of Etta A. Partridge, late of Worcester, deceased. It is not now contended that there was error in denying the issue of due execution. The arguments of the contestants are now directed to the issue of sound mind [753] and fraud or undue influence. Upon consideration of the statements of expected evidence in the light of established principles of law governing the framing of jury issues (including recognition of the element of discretion vested in the probate judge) we conclude that there was no error in the denial of these motions. Fuller v. Sylvia, 240 Mass. 49. Hannon v. Gorman, 296 Mass. 437.

E. F. Simpson & Nunziato Fusaro, for the contestants, submitted a brief. W. L. Macintosh, for the proponent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maynard v. Morton, 82 N.E.2d 798, 323 Mass. 752, 1948 Mass. LEXIS 630 (Mass. 1948).

82 N.E.2d 798 (Maynard v. Morton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fuller v. Sylvia
133 N.E. 384 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)
Hannon v. Gorman
6 N.E.2d 433 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)