Maynard v. Mier

85 Ind. 317
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1882
DocketNo. 9368
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 85 Ind. 317 (Maynard v. Mier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maynard v. Mier, 85 Ind. 317 (Ind. 1882).

Opinion

Woods, C. J.

Appeal from a judgment on a promissory note, a copy of which was filed with the complaint. It contains a promise in the ordinary form, to pay a sum named, “ with interest at the rate of ten per cent, after maturity, and ten per cent, attorney’s fees.”

It is claimed that the court erred in overruling the defendants’ demurrer to the complaint. The entire argument on the point is in these words: The complaint is not sufficient in this, it is not definite and certain, and the copy of the note shows that the agreement (is) to pay ten per cent, attorney’s [318]*318fees, which we insist is void, and that, therefore, the note is-usurious as to that amount, and should be held void, and the: judgment reversed.”

. If the stipulation for attorney’s fees were conceded to be void, the validity of the note would not be otherwise affected.» and consequently the demurrer was properly overruled. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. State
97 Tenn. 50 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1896)
Oppenheimer v. Bank
33 L.R.A. 767 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 Ind. 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maynard-v-mier-ind-1882.