Maynard v. Maynard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Maynard v. Maynard

547 So. 2d 714, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1928, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4623, 1989 WL 90925

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 15, 1989

DocketNo. 88-2936

StatusPublished

This text of 547 So. 2d 714 (Maynard v. Maynard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maynard v. Maynard, 547 So. 2d 714, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1928, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4623, 1989 WL 90925 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the husband’s appeal and the wife’s cross-appeal of the amended final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We find merit only in the wife’s contention on cross-appeal that the trial court erred in failing to award her interest on her half of the parties’ $100,000 certificate of deposit from the time of the final hearing until the time she obtains possession of the funds. Graham v. Graham, 519 So.2d 29 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); see Parker v. Brinson Constr. Co., 78 So.2d 873 (Fla.1955); Dade County v. American Re-Ins. Co., 467 So.2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the trial court’s judgment and remand to the trial court with directions to award the wife interest. We affirm the final judgment in all other respects. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with directions. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the husband’s appeal and the wife’s cross-appeal of the amended final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We find merit only in the wife’s contention on cross-appeal that the trial court erred in failing to award her interest on her half of the parties’ $100,000 certificate of deposit from the time of the final hearing until the time she obtains possession of the funds. Graham v. Graham, 519 So.2d 29 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); see Parker v. Brinson Constr. Co., 78 So.2d 873 (Fla.1955); Dade County v. American Re-Ins. Co., 467 So.2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the trial court’s judgment and remand to the trial court with directions to award the wife interest. We affirm the final judgment in all other respects. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with directions. ■

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 So. 2d 714, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1928, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4623, 1989 WL 90925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maynard-v-maynard-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack