Maynard v. Griffin

93 S.E. 401, 147 Ga. 293, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 154
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 17, 1917
DocketNo. 291
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 93 S.E. 401 (Maynard v. Griffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maynard v. Griffin, 93 S.E. 401, 147 Ga. 293, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 154 (Ga. 1917).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Where the record does not affirmatively show that the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing an interlocutory injunction, this court will not reverse the judgment. This record does not affirmatively show such abuse of discretion. The facts of the case differ from the facts in the case of Tolbert v. Teal, 146 Ga. 644 (92 S. E. 46). In the latter ease it was proved that a large area of the county was omitted from the districts laid off, as if the omitted territory were not a part of the county. In the present case the evidence was such as to permit a contrary finding.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Bankers Insurance v. Pro-Travel, Inc.
244 S.E.2d 103 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Brooks v. Carter
120 S.E.2d 332 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)
Stephens v. School District No. 3
114 S.E. 197 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 401, 147 Ga. 293, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maynard-v-griffin-ga-1917.