Maynard v. Eaton Corp.

872 N.E.2d 947, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1503
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 29, 2007·No. 2007-1069·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Marion App. No. 9-06-33, 2007-Ohio-1906. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals Journal Entry filed June 7, 2007:

“Does the amendment to R.C. 1343.03, effective June 2, 2004, adjust the 10% rate of post-judgment interest calculated on a final judgment that was entered prior to the date of the amendment, but not paid in full and pending on appeal?”

[1504]*1504Lanzinger, J., dissents.

The conflict cases are Hausser & Taylor, LLP v. Accelerated Sys. Integration, Inc., Cuyahoga App. No. 86547, 2006-Ohio-1582, and Hilliard v. First Indus., L.P., 165 Ohio App.3d 335, 2005-Ohio-6469.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maynard v. Eaton Corp., 872 N.E.2d 947, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1503 (Ohio 2007).

872 N.E.2d 947 (Maynard v. Eaton Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maynard v. Eaton Corp.
895 N.E.2d 145 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)