Maynard v. Eaton Corp.
This text of 872 N.E.2d 947 (Maynard v. Eaton Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Marion App. No. 9-06-33, 2007-Ohio-1906. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals Journal Entry filed June 7, 2007:
“Does the amendment to R.C. 1343.03, effective June 2, 2004, adjust the 10% rate of post-judgment interest calculated on a final judgment that was entered prior to the date of the amendment, but not paid in full and pending on appeal?”
The conflict cases are Hausser & Taylor, LLP v. Accelerated Sys. Integration, Inc., Cuyahoga App. No. 86547, 2006-Ohio-1582, and Hilliard v. First Indus., L.P., 165 Ohio App.3d 335, 2005-Ohio-6469.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
872 N.E.2d 947, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maynard-v-eaton-corp-ohio-2007.