MAYMI v. State
This text of 981 A.2d 1173 (MAYMI v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ABEL MAYMI, Defendant Below-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and BERGER, Justices.
ORDER
Randy J. Holland, Justice
This 25th day of September 2009, after careful consideration of appellant's opening brief and the State's motion to affirm, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court's well-reasoned decision dated June 23, 2009. The trial court did not err in concluding that appellant's motion for postconviction relief was both time-barred and previously adjudicated and that he had failed to overcome these procedural hurdles.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
981 A.2d 1173, 2009 WL 3083021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maymi-v-state-del-2009.