Maylo Imports & Arthur J. Fritz & Co. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 359
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 24, 1960
DocketNo. 63855; protest 303764-K (Los Angeles)
StatusPublished
This text of 44 Cust. Ct. 359 (Maylo Imports & Arthur J. Fritz & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Maylo Imports & Arthur J. Fritz & Co. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 359 (cusc 1960).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kleenex dispenser covers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Quon Quon Company v. United States (41 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2038), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Quon Quon Co. v. United States
41 Cust. Ct. 178 (U.S. Customs Court, 1958)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
44 Cust. Ct. 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maylo-imports-arthur-j-fritz-co-v-united-states-cusc-1960.