Mayhew v. State

452 So. 2d 1134, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14168
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 18, 1984
DocketNo. 84-285
StatusPublished

This text of 452 So. 2d 1134 (Mayhew v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayhew v. State, 452 So. 2d 1134, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14168 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant pled no contest to possession of cannabis and phentermine. She reserved the right to appeal the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress.

[1135]*1135We find that the inventory search of defendant’s purse, which yielded the contraband, was proper. See State v. Barth, 434 So.2d 19 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); State v. Forbes, 419 So.2d 782 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Accordingly, we reject the points raised by defendant.

Judgment and sentence affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Forbes
419 So. 2d 782 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
State v. Barth
434 So. 2d 19 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
452 So. 2d 1134, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayhew-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.