Mayfield v. State
This text of 86 S.E. 284 (Mayfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a trial for'burglary, where the evidence upon which the State mainly relied, and without which there could have been no legal conviction, consisted of proof showing possession by the accused of goods which had been stolen from the burglarized premises, and there [116]*116was an explanation by the accused of that possession, which, if true, was consistent with his innocence, an entire failure by the court, even without a written request, to submit to the jury the question whether that explanation was reasonable and satisfactory is cause for a new trial. Morris v. State, 5 Ga. App. 300 (63 S. E. 26); Tarver v. State, 95 Ga. 222 (4), 228 (21 S. E. 381). Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 S.E. 284, 17 Ga. App. 115, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayfield-v-state-gactapp-1915.