Mayfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mayfield v. State

717 So. 2d 159, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11644, 1998 WL 617707

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 16, 1998

DocketNo. 97-2278

StatusPublished

This text of 717 So. 2d 159 (Mayfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mayfield v. State, 717 So. 2d 159, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11644, 1998 WL 617707 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s convictions and sentences are affirmed. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). However, based on the State’s proper confession of error, this cause is remanded for the correction of the judgment to reflect that the defendant was convicted of criminal mischief in an amount of less than $200.00, a misdemeanor of the second degree.

Affirmed; remanded for correction of the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s convictions and sentences are affirmed. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). However, based on the State’s proper confession of error, this cause is remanded for the correction of the judgment to reflect that the defendant was convicted of criminal mischief in an amount of less than $200.00, a misdemeanor of the second degree.

Affirmed; remanded for correction of the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

717 So. 2d 159, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11644, 1998 WL 617707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayfield-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack