Mayfield v. Spiva
14 So. 47, 100 Ala. 223
This text of 14 So. 47 (Mayfield v. Spiva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mayfield v. Spiva, 14 So. 47, 100 Ala. 223 (Ala. 1893).
Opinion
This case must be dealt with as if May-field had personal knowledge of Spiva’s mortgage on the animal in controversy. Such is the effect of our statutes of registration. This being so, the latter, (Spiva) did nothing and said nothing to authorize Mayfield to place the animal under a lien which can override the prior mortgage lien. Jones, Chat. Mortg., § 472.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Billingsley v. McRae
17 So. 2d 286 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1944)
Matheson v. Farmers' Bank & Trust Co.
116 So. 906 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1928)
J. C. Walden Auto Co. v. Mixon
71 So. 694 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
14 So. 47, 100 Ala. 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayfield-v-spiva-ala-1893.