Mayfield v. Page

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Mayfield v. Page

1967 OK CR 40, 425 P.2d 619, 1967 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 317

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 22, 1967

DocketNo. A-14095

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1967 OK CR 40 (Mayfield v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mayfield v. Page, 1967 OK CR 40, 425 P.2d 619, 1967 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 317 (Okla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge.

This is an original proceeding in which Daniel Mayfield seeks his release from confinement in the State Penitentiary at Mc-Alester, Oklahoma, where he is currently confined by virtue of judgments and sentences rendered against him in the District Court of Muskogee County, Oklahoma, for the crimes of Kidnapping and Larceny of an Automobile, for which he received sentences of twenty years and ten years, the same to run consecutively. The judgments and sentences were pronounced against him on his plea of guilty, on the 18th day of July, 1956.

Although the petitioner urges that he is entitled to be discharged from confinement in that he has satisfied the judgments and sentences imposed against him, nothing is offered in support of these allegations, but to the contrary, the records of the penitentiary disclose that the minimum release date is January 27, 1971, and that the maximum release date could be July 18, 1986.

It is therefore clear that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief prayed for and the writ of habeas corpus is accordingly Denied. Writ denied.

NIX, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge.

This is an original proceeding in which Daniel Mayfield seeks his release from confinement in the State Penitentiary at Mc-Alester, Oklahoma, where he is currently confined by virtue of judgments and sentences rendered against him in the District Court of Muskogee County, Oklahoma, for the crimes of Kidnapping and Larceny of an Automobile, for which he received sentences of twenty years and ten years, the same to run consecutively. The judgments and sentences were pronounced against him on his plea of guilty, on the 18th day of July, 1956.

Although the petitioner urges that he is entitled to be discharged from confinement in that he has satisfied the judgments and sentences imposed against him, nothing is offered in support of these allegations, but to the contrary, the records of the penitentiary disclose that the minimum release date is January 27, 1971, and that the maximum release date could be July 18, 1986.

It is therefore clear that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief prayed for and the writ of habeas corpus is accordingly Denied. Writ denied.

NIX, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1967 OK CR 40, 425 P.2d 619, 1967 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayfield-v-page-oklacrimapp-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack