Mayfield v. Fleming
This text of 32 F. App'x 116 (Mayfield v. Fleming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Curtis Lee Mayfield appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. Mayfield was a prisoner in the Therapeutic Community at the Indian Creek Correctional Center (“ICCC”). As the district court noted, Mayfield is no longer a prisoner in that facility; consequently, his claim for injunctive relief is moot. Mayfield v. Fleming, No. CA-00-1773-AM (E.D.Va. Aug. 29, 2001). Further, the district court correctly concluded that Mayfield’s claim for money damages is barred because he can show no physical injury. 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e(e) (West Supp.2001). Accordingly, the district court properly granted summary judgment against Mayfield. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 F. App'x 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayfield-v-fleming-ca4-2002.