Mayfield v. Fleming

32 F. App'x 116
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 16, 2002·No. 01-7602·Unpublished·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Curtis Lee Mayfield appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. Mayfield was a prisoner in the Therapeutic Community at the Indian Creek Correctional Center (“ICCC”). As the district court noted, Mayfield is no longer a prisoner in that facility; consequently, his claim for injunctive relief is moot. Mayfield v. Fleming, No. CA-00-1773-AM (E.D.Va. Aug. 29, 2001). Further, the district court correctly concluded that Mayfield’s claim for money damages is barred because he can show no physical injury. 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e(e) (West Supp.2001). Accordingly, the district court properly granted summary judgment against Mayfield. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mayfield v. Fleming, 32 F. App'x 116 (4th Cir. 2002).

32 F. App'x 116 (Mayfield v. Fleming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goins v. Jenkins
D. South Carolina, 2024
Jones v. Solomon
W.D. North Carolina, 2021
Bolick v. Thompson
D. South Carolina, 2021
Kimble v. Jenkins
W.D. North Carolina, 2019
Kimble v. Lassiter
W.D. North Carolina, 2019