Mayfield v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

295 F. 112, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3156
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 10, 1924
DocketNo. 2124
StatusPublished

This text of 295 F. 112 (Mayfield v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayfield v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 295 F. 112, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3156 (4th Cir. 1924).

Opinion

ROSE, Circuit Judge.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, plaintiff below, recovered judgment against the plaintiffs in error, defendants in the original suit, upon two other of the promissory notes, the history of which is stated in the opinion in Mayfield v. Equitable Trust Co. of New York, 295 Fed. 109, handed down simultaneously herewith.

For the reasons therein stated, the judgment below was right, and is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mayfield v. Equitable Trust Co.
295 F. 109 (Fourth Circuit, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
295 F. 112, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayfield-v-federal-reserve-bank-of-atlanta-ca4-1924.