Mayfield v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Fourth Circuit

Mayfield v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

295 F. 112, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3156

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 10, 1924·No. No. 2124·Published

Opinion

ROSE, Circuit Judge.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, plaintiff below, recovered judgment against the plaintiffs in error, defendants in the original suit, upon two other of the promissory notes, the history of which is stated in the opinion in Mayfield v. Equitable Trust Co. of New York, 295 Fed. 109, handed down simultaneously herewith.

For the reasons therein stated, the judgment below was right, and is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROSE, Circuit Judge.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, plaintiff below, recovered judgment against the plaintiffs in error, defendants in the original suit, upon two other of the promissory notes, the history of which is stated in the opinion in Mayfield v. Equitable Trust Co. of New York, 295 Fed. 109, handed down simultaneously herewith.

For the reasons therein stated, the judgment below was right, and is affirmed.

Mayfield v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 295 F. 112, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3156 (4th Cir. 1924).

Pincite

295 F. 112 (Mayfield v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related